tg-me.com/lm_Brokens/130
Last Update:
BY I'M BROKEN💔💔
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/tk3EbzJdIXiRA8PIst_A8zfTs65fYlU7naxF6KPFN7RUqycbFs3J8t2cApjWfQPMDQ4nsLwr2YtDlhJXg8Ci6LdYHL6G32STgSAFWoWscfklNWh_nIX9CWWiRepA3dzuWTXmHnb-ipfsn2UghEY4EzueS59UHPHJypsbFOcvNVCE5e1ZlKVE7ZtSsUOGMBBZcQDbmusoIHOai8UTCpnkKLJr1XULb4PjoBu1DV06__EjTU3OkvlalxrOwhQr99b6afS9mNuvfnJIJEnNcStVViY8G4Fv6zUoKzcInUcqGiccP5fa-Opf6F_uOqVpD_92GfqF_YJ9KKyfD6FUMTxUPw.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/lm_Brokens/130
BY I'M BROKEN💔💔
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
I& 39;M BROKEN from no